Global Communications

I was just wondering what the Office of Global Communications has been up to. Not to mention where the dialogue has been and where the Global Messenger has been going.

Now there has been a new project to add to the amount of work that we must all do since the three branches of government and the press have done such a heckuva job.

My comment is that the light of day does not necessarily clarify if the source is not trusted. That and the reasonable caution that there will be so much more put out there. In fact if the source is in the dark, who would you trust, and how would we verify, unless we trust someone. I'm sure the answer is somewhere.

Meanwhile my concern is the link to the word propaganda. It is not a bad thing, but it is more likely an unverifiable thing.

Meanwhile 2.0 or <-0.0> meaning preemptively: the Neo-Context
as in excuses to review a recent NIE and that is being reviewed as to the quality of its estimate.